Setting the Price of products
Setting the Price of products:-
A firm must set a price for the
first time when it develops a new product, when it introduces its regular
product into a new distribution channel or geographical area, and when it
enters bids on new contract work. The firm must decide where to position its
product on quality and price. Most markets have three to five price points or
tiers. Marriott Hotels is good at developing different brands or variations of
brands for different price points: Marriott Vacation Club—Vacation Villas (highest
price), Marriott Marquis (high price), Marriott (highmedium price), Renaissance
(medium-high price), Courtyard (medium price), TownePlace Suites (medium-low
price), and Fairfield Inn (low price). Firms devise their branding strategies
to help convey the price-quality tiers of their products or services to
consumers.30 The firm must consider many factors in setting its pricing policy.
summarizes the six steps in the process.
Step 1: Selecting the Pricing
Objective The company first decides where it wants to position its market
offering. The clearer a firm’s objectives, the easier it is to set price. Five
major objectives are: survival, maximum current profit, maximum market share,
maximum market skimming, and product-quality leadership.
SURVIVAL Companies pursue
survival as their major objective if they are plagued with overcapacity,
intense competition, or changing consumer wants. As long as prices cover
variable costs and some fixed costs, the company stays in business. Survival is
a short-run objective; in the long run, the firm must learn how to add value or
face extinction.
MAXIMUM CURRENT PROFIT Many
companies try to set a price that will maximize current profits. They estimate
the demand and costs associated with alternative prices and choose the price
that produces maximum current profit, cash flow, or rate of return on
investment. This strategy assumes the firm knows its demand and cost functions;
in reality, these are difficult to estimate. In emphasizing current
performance, the company may sacrifice long-run performance by ignoring the
effects of other marketing variables, competitors’ reactions, and legal
restraints on price.
MAXIMUM MARKET SHARE Some
companies want to maximize their market share. They believe a higher sales
volume will lead to lower unit costs and higher long-run profit. They set the
lowest price, assuming the market is price sensitive. Texas Instruments (TI)
famously practiced this market-penetration pricing for years. TI would build a
large plant, set its price as low as possible, win a large market share,
experience falling costs, and cut its price further as costs fell. The
following conditions favor adopting a market-penetration pricing strategy:
(1) The market is highly price
sensitive and a low price stimulates market growth;
(2) production and distribution
Marriott’s hotel brands differ in price points and the levels of service they
offer.
Setting a Pricing Policy:-
1. Selecting the Pricing
Objective
2. Determining Demand
3. Estimating Costs
4. Analyzing Competitors’ Costs,
Prices, and Offers
5. Selecting a Pricing Method
6. Selecting the Final Price
SHAPING THE MARKET OFFERINGS
costs fall with accumulated production experience; and a low price discourages
actual and potential competition. MAXIMUM
MARKET SKIMMING Companies
unveiling a new technology favor setting high prices to maximize market
skimming. Sony is a frequent practitioner of market-skimming pricing, in which
prices start high and slowly drop over time. When Sony introduced the world’s
first high-definition television (HDTV) to the Japanese market in 1990, it was
priced at $43,000. So that Sony could “skim” the maximum amount of revenue from
the various segments of the market, the price dropped steadily through the years—a
28-inch Sony HDTV cost just over $6,000 in 1993, but a 40-inch Sony HDTV cost
only $600 in 2010. This strategy can be fatal, however, if a worthy competitor
decides to price low. When Philips, the Dutch electronics manufacturer, priced
its videodisc players to make a profit on each, Japanese competitors priced low
and rapidly built their market share, which in turn pushed down their costs
substantially. Moreover, consumers who buy early at the highest prices may be
dissatisfied if they compare themselves to those who buy later at a lower
price. When Apple dropped the iPhone’s price from $600 to $400 only two months
after its introduction, public outcry caused the firm to give initial buyers a
$100 credit toward future Apple purchases.32 Market skimming makes sense under
the following conditions:
(1) A sufficient number of buyers
have a high current demand;
(2) the unit costs of producing a
small volume are high enough to cancel the advantage of charging what the
traffic will bear;
(3) the high initial price does
not attract more competitors to the market;
(4) the high price communicates
the image of a superior product.
PRODUCT-QUALITY LEADERSHIP A
company might aim to be the product-quality leader in the market. Many brands
strive to be “affordable luxuries”—products or services characterized by high
levels of perceived quality, taste, and status with a price just high enough
not to be out of consumers’ reach. Brands such as Starbucks, Aveda , Victoria ’s
Secret, BMW, and Viking have positioned themselves as quality leaders in their
categories, combining quality, luxury, and premium prices with an intensely
loyal customer base. Grey Goose and Absolut carved out a superpremium niche in
the essentially odorless, colorless, and tasteless vodka category through clever
on-premise and off-premise marketing that made the brands seem hip and
exclusive. OTHER OBJECTIVES Nonprofit and public organizations may have other
pricing objectives. A university aims for partial cost recovery, knowing that
it must rely on private gifts and public grants to cover its remaining costs. A
nonprofit hospital may aim for full cost recovery in its pricing. A nonprofit
theater company may price its productions to fill the maximum number of seats.
A social service agency may set a service price geared to client income.
Whatever the specific objective, businesses that use price as a strategic tool
will profit more than those that simply let costs or the market determine their
pricing. For art museums, which earn an average of only 5 percent of their
revenues from admission charges, pricing can send a message that affects their
public image and the amount of donations and sponsorships they receive.
Step 2: Determining Demand Each
price will lead to a different level of demand and have a different impact on a
company’s marketing objectives. The normally inverse relationship between price
and demand is captured in a demand curve: The higher the price, the lower the
demand. For prestige goods, the demand curve sometimes slopes upward. One
perfume company raised its price and sold more rather than less! Some consumers
take the higher price to signify a better product. However, if the price is too
high, demand may fall. PRICE SENSITIVITY The demand curve shows the market’s
probable purchase quantity at alternative prices. It sums the reactions of many
individuals with different price sensitivities. The first step in estimating
demand is to understand what affects price sensitivity. Generally speaking,
customers are less price sensitive to low-cost items or items they buy
infrequently. They are also less price sensitive when
(1) there are few or no
substitutes or competitors;
(2) they do not readily Apple
created an uproar among its early-adopter customers when it significantly lowered
the price of its iPhone after only two months. DEVELOPING PRICING STRATEGIES
AND PROGRAMS notice the higher price;
(3) they are slow to change their
buying habits;
(4) they think the higher prices
are justified; and
(5) price is only a small part of
the total cost of obtaining, operating, and servicing the product over its
lifetime. A seller can successfully charge a higher price than competitors if
it can convince customers that it offers the lowest total cost of ownership
(TCO). Marketers often treat the service elements in a product offering as
sales incentives rather than as value-enhancing augmentations for which they
can charge. In fact, pricing expert Tom Nagle believes the most common mistake
manufacturers have made in recent years is to offer all sorts of services to
differentiate their products without charging for them. Of course, companies
prefer customers who are less price-sensitive. lists some characteristics
associated with decreased price sensitivity. On the other hand, the Internet
has the potential to increase price sensitivity. In some established, fairly
big-ticket categories, such as auto retailing and term insurance, consumers pay
lower prices as a result of the Internet. Car buyers use the Internet to gather
information and borrow the negotiating clout of an online buying service. But
customers may have to visit multiple sites to realize these savings, and they
don’t always do so. Targeting only price-sensitive consumers may in fact be
“leaving money on the table.
Comments
Post a Comment