Managing Customer Expectations in marketing
Managing Customer Expectations in marketing:-
Customers form service
expectations from many sources, such as past experiences, word of mouth, and
advertising. In general, customers compare the perceived service with the
expected service.67 If the perceived service falls below the expected service,
customers are disappointed. Successful companies add benefits to their offering
that not only satisfy customers but surprise and delight them. Delighting
customers is a matter of exceeding expectations.68 The service-quality model in
Figure 13.6 highlights the main requirements for delivering high service
quality.69 It identifies five gaps that cause unsuccessful delivery: 1. Gap
between consumer expectation and management perception—Management does not
always correctly perceive what customers want. Hospital administrators may
think patients want better food, but patients may be more concerned with nurse
responsiveness. 2. Gap between management perception and service-quality
specification—Management might correctly perceive customers’ wants but not set
a performance standard. Hospital administrators may tell the nurses to give
“fast” service without specifying it in minutes. 3. Gap between service-quality
specifications and service delivery—Employees might be poorly trained, or
incapable of or unwilling to meet the standard; they may be held to conflicting
standards, such as taking time to listen to customers and serving them fast. 4.
Gap between service delivery and external communications—Consumer expectations
are affected by statements made by company representatives and ads. If a
hospital brochure shows a beautiful room but the patient finds it to be cheap
and tacky looking, external communications have distorted the customer’s
expectations. CONSUMER MARKETER Word-of-mouth communications Personal needs
Past experience Expected service Perceived service Service delivery (including
preand post-contacts) External communications to consumers Translation of
perceptions into service-quality specifications Management perceptions of
consumer expectations |Fig. 13.6| Service-Quality Model Sources: A.
Parasuraman, Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry, “A Conceptual Model of
Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing
(Fall 1985), Reprinted with permission of the American Marketing Association.
The model is more fully discussed or elaborated in Valarie Zeithaml, Mary Jo
Bitner, and Dwayne D. Gremler, Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus
across the Firm, Gap between perceived service and expected service—This gap
occurs when the consumer misperceives the service quality. The physician may
keep visiting the patient to show care, but the patient may interpret this as
an indication that something really is wrong. Based on this service-quality
model, researchers identified five determinants of service quality, in this
order of importance:
1. Reliability—The ability to
perform the promised service dependably and accurately.
2. Responsiveness—Willingness to
help customers and provide prompt service.
3. Assurance—The knowledge and
courtesy of employees and their ability to convey trust and confidence.
4. Empathy—The provision of
caring, individualized attention to customers.
5. Tangibles—The appearance of
physical facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials. Based
on these five factors, the researchers developed the item SERVQUAL scale. They
also note there is a zone of tolerance, or a range where a service dimension
would be deemed satisfactory, anchored by the minimum level consumers are
willing to accept and the level they believe can and should be delivered. The
service-quality model highlights some of the gaps that cause unsuccessful
service delivery. Subsequent research has extended the model. One dynamic
process model of service quality was based on the premise that customer
perceptions and expectations of service quality change over time, but at any
one point they are a function of prior expectations about what will and what
should happen during the service encounter, as well as the actual service delivered
during the last contact. Tests of the dynamic process model reveal that the two
different types of expectations have opposite effects on perceptions of service
quality.
1. Increasing customer
expectations of what the firm will deliver can lead to improved perceptions of
overall service quality.
2. Decreasing customer
expectations of what the firm should deliver can also lead to improved
perceptions of overall service quality.
SERVQUAL Attributes Reliability
Empathy • Providing service as promised • Giving customers individual attention
• Dependability in handling customers’ service problems • Employees who deal
with customers in a caring fashion • Performing services right the first time •
Having the customer’s best interests at heart • Providing services at the
promised time • Employees who understand the needs of their customers •
Maintaining error-free records • Convenient business hours • Employees who have
the knowledge to answer customer questions Responsiveness Tangibles • Keeping
customer informed as to when services will be performed • Modern equipment •
Prompt service to customers • Visually appealing facilities • Willingness to
help customers • Employees who have a neat, professional appearance • Readiness
to respond to customers’ requests • Visually appealing materials associated
with the service Assurance • Employees who instill confidence in customers •
Making customers feel safe in their transactions • Employees who are
consistently courteous Source: A. Parasuraman, Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard
L. Berry, “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for
Future Research,” Journal of Marketing (Fall 1985), Reprinted by permission of
the American Marketing Association. DESIGNING AND MANAGING SERVICES | Much work
has validated the role of expectations in consumers’ interpretations and
evaluations of the service encounter and the relationship they adopt with a
firm over time.Consumers are often forward-looking with respect to their
decision to keep or switch from a service relationship. Any marketing activity
that affects current or expected future usage can help to solidify a service
relationship. With continuously provided services, such as public utilities,
health care, financial and computing services, insurance, and other
professional, membership, or subscription services, customers have been
observed to mentally calculate their payment equity—the perceived economic
benefits in relationship to the economic costs. In other words, customers ask
themselves, “Am I using this service enough, given what I pay for it?”
Long-term service relationships can have a dark side. An ad agency client may
feel that over time the agency is losing objectivity, becoming stale in its
thinking, or beginning to take advantage of the relationship.
Comments
Post a Comment